VANTAGE

Human evaluation for better AI systems.

Maurvi AI helps teams design LLM evaluation, preference, QA, and safety review workflows that make model quality visible and testable before scale-up.

What we support

Evaluation workflows that help teams judge model quality with structure.

Model response evaluation

Preference and pairwise comparison

Safety and policy review

Factuality and relevance checks

Instruction following review

Helpfulness and utility scoring

Comparative model review

Classification and rubric-based QA

Evaluation approach

A clear process for judging model quality and improving it over time.

01

Define the rubric

We align on the quality criteria, dimensions, and failure modes that matter most for the task.

02

Calibrate on examples

Representative examples establish the standard before larger evaluation work begins.

03

Review and compare

Human review supports quality assessment, disagreement handling, and model comparison.

Typical use cases

Built for the points where product quality and human judgment meet.

Model quality review

Assess response quality against business goals, policy expectations, and edge-case performance.

Prompt and system design validation

Compare candidate instructions, generation strategies, and output choices across dimensions of quality.

Preference collection

Capture pairwise judgments and ranking data to support model tuning, evaluation, and feedback loops.

Safety and policy review

Support human review of harmful, sensitive, or policy-violating output patterns.

Operational model

Human review without creating a fragile or unscalable process.

Rubric-based scoring

Reference examples and counterexamples

Disagreement capture and adjudication

Traceable evaluation notes

Start a conversation

Need a more structured evaluation workflow?

Bring the task, model, rubric, or quality questions. We can help shape the evaluation process before it becomes a noisy, hard-to-trust workflow.